The world is changing and technology is with it.
Main because since software the product deployments are becoming more frequent and Software houses and Service-oriented companies are pushing hard on T2M (Time to Market) selling factor to keep them visible on the market.
Although all upcoming projects are prerequisites of non-functional requirements still the same (mainly),
- the infrastructure design leveraging from Service Oriented Architecture
- the solution must be scalable and automated to provision
- the solution capable to be hosted in the Cloud as well as on a hybrid network infrastructure
- the solution is ISO 9126 compliant
- first release completion time of 6 months
, amount of functional requirements needed for the first release keeps growing and in most cases do not help to achieve delivery in a given time.
And that is pretty bad.
Therefore “smart” selection of the frameworks and tools to use for building whatever investor wants to build a solution is an absolute must.
But, you won’t be able to succeed without the technical knowledge and experience of the production team! (the place where things are getting serious)
To get familiar with what skill sets to seek out while building a team capable to produce business value early from the beginning of project initiation, I have created a list of the suggested frameworks and platforms to use.
Hope it helps you to battle this constant competition market and investor pressure and elevate the progress in the initial phase of solution development as much as possible.
- Outsystems PaaS
You are maybe already familiar with the term “low code”. The word on which many conceptual developers are rolling their eyes up. But hold on – if all that investors want is to get the product out of the door as soon as possible and for the cost related to head x time spent on the project (which would probably be somewhere around 50% less as opposed to the traditional way of coding in this case), just give it to them!
Every solid developer must be familiar with this PaaS these days if not with Outsystems then with some other alternative such as PowerApps, for example.
Heyou – all Node.js Devs are lifting their eyebrow. Yes, very powerful framework, indeed. Usage of LoopBack CLI cannot be easier thanks to documentation built by many contributors from this OpenSource project.
Simply put, this framework allows you to build your complete backend infrastructure with speed which elevates your project progress exponentially. You can choose from REST, SOAP, GraphQL, and RPC servers/services and manage all of these nodes with PM2 process management systems.
This CLI utility from AWS is becoming more and more popular among developers from generation Y. Nobody likes to deal with building the infrastructure on the DevOps level, unless it’s ABSOLUTELY necessary. And to be fair a lot of the service provisioning commands can be easily automated.
Therefore, a utility that scaffolds everything you need for hosting your system is a necessary skill these days.
If not going to use any of these “low code” platforms mentioned above for building your solution, a solid provisioning automation system (“engine”) and paradigm for not only infrastructure automation provisioning but also for keeping track of infrastructure changes in source code is the must. You cannot go wrong with Azure DevOps/ARM Templates or Terraform. Both offer you a lot of capabilities and automation to follow IoC (Infrastructure as a code) paradigm.
To me, Terraform is a better option for those thinking to incorporate platforms of different technologies into the solution.
This is all for today, hope you enjoyed this reading today, and leave me your thoughts down below in the comments!
Thanks for staying, subscribe to my blog, and leave me a comment below.
PS: The technology cannot set the project for success if architecture, design, and test automation are getting compromised. Not having the right team, implemented processes, following the best practices, and a need of keeping good progress momentum on the project, your entire ship can turn in the opposite direction and end up with catastrophic failure.